Fabricated History and Forgotten Light: The Renaissance, the Dark Ages, and Two Domes of Heaven
Fabricated History and Forgotten Light: The Renaissance, the Dark Ages, and Two Domes of Heaven
04/01/2025
OVERUNITY ELECTRICITY
According to the Flat Earth Model under the newly formed Ice Dome in 1802, mankind was once imprisoned in darkness. This prison had no sun and moon, nor did it have the current Ice Dome. That was from the early 16th century to 1802. This period was a Dark Age in the sense that there was no natural light.
This is a Geography science based on mathematics and practical surveys, which has been verified by researchers, although there have been opposing groups to argue for many years. According to the model of this Geography science, there are 2 domes of heaven, one is electromagnetic, and a newly formed Ice Dome.
That is the result of the investigation of historian Gorgi Shepentulevski, he is the author of 2 books Hidden Under the Dome!
The digital reality (matrix) of controlled history - based on the idea of Gorgi Shepentulevski proves that history was written by AI in the 19th century! Gorgi Shepentulevski used to work for large organizations, and he knew many secrets of organizations. Could Gorgi Shepentulevski be the traitor professor?
Humanity has been imprisoned in the dark for more than 200 years. Outside the dark area is still the old world (Tartaria) that was changed after the great flood in the early 16th century. The Renaissance took place in the area with natural light, outside the dark area that imprisoned humanity. The dark age was inside the area without natural light under the large dome of the sky, the Electromagnetic Dome. This means that the dark age and the renaissance were at the same time, but the geographical locations were different. This is what I personally noticed when I looked at the investigations of Anatoly T. Fomenko, David Ewing Jr and Gorgi Shepentulevski.
This also explains the presence of Renaissance artifacts, for example: Da Vinci left behind evidence of Airplanes, Robots, Submarines and Tanks, etc. There is also Renaissance art and Astronomical knowledge, including geometrical precision in art, celestial maps showing detailed astronomical knowledge that some believe could not be obtained from naked eye observation alone. Further evidence is provided by unusual artifacts and maps: the Antikythera Mechanism, the Piri Reis map. With the Piri Reis map, created in 1513, supposedly depicting Antarctica without ice, raising questions about its source. Some have suggested that it may suggest advanced cartographic knowledge of antiquity.
It is also fitting that Anatoly T. Fomenko much of medieval history was copied or fabricated from the Renaissance. Fomenko argues that many medieval architectural styles, such as Gothic cathedrals, appear to have been inspired by Renaissance innovations. This implies that the “medieval” period was largely invented to fill gaps in the historical timeline. He points to the work of historians such as Joseph Scaliger and Dionysius Petavius, who standardized Western chronology in the 16th and 17th centuries, as instrumental in creating the traditional historical narrative. According to Fomenko, their reliance on faulty sources and biased interpretations led to an artificial extension of history.
There is much more evidence and argument in Fomenko’s work that is not covered here.
The Dark Ages have many divisions, basically from the 5th to the 15th century.
The half (or part) of the history in the area of Europe and Asia when people were locked in darkness was plagiarized to become the history of the Dark Ages as in the official history. Furthermore, the history of war in this period itself was modified by the church organization in Europe created by the Jesuits and monks. Therefore, we need to look closely at this period.
The remaining half (the other) of the history in this dark area is the history that is almost completely hidden, leaving only evidence to investigate. The books of David Ewing Jr, Anatoly T. Fomenko, and Gorgi Shepentulevski investigate this remaining half. The other half of this history is not full of sin in the darkness.
The whole of Europe and Asia was locked in darkness. The light was only in the churches occupied by the Jesuits. They captured humanity to eat flesh and drink blood. This is seen when from the 19th century until today, people still discovered too many bones and skulls in the churches. Humans were eaten in the churches of the Jesuits. The churches with these skeletons have no connection with the Bible and God. This is clearly a crime. The investigation in the book Tartaria - Skulls and Bones quickly revealed this crime.
Europe and Asia went through a dark age with a lot of crime here. Darkness is a place that is complicit in sin. The investigation results of David Ewing Jr. showed that from 1700 to 1900, there were too many crimes and conspiracies taking place in Europe and Asia, including the kidnapping of children. The investigation is contained in the book Tartaria - Orphan Train.
As for the results of Gorgi Shepentulevski's investigation, see his two books Hidden Under the Dome of the Sky!
Investigating history as a science with "UNDER THE DOME" by Gorgi Shepentulevski
For full proof of a Great Flood in 1802, you need to read the book UNDER THE DOME:
The last important thing: if Gorgi Shepentulevski was right in his statement that the sun and moon did not exist from the beginning of the 16th century to 1802, then the Age of Enlightenment was actually in the dark! And so, the official history has been completely turned upside down, they turned the dark period into the Renaissance and the Age of Enlightenment (17th and 18th centuries). You cannot find the exact truth in the historical documents written by the Jesuit order of monks and nuns. In modern times, the official historians were all funded to create history according to the wishes of the group that rules the world. According to David Ewing Jr., those historians worked for the Bank.
Historians also conspire and are allies of the group that creates fake relics and artifacts.
Scientists who investigate these conspiracies are labeled as conspiracy theorists, despite their analysis and factual evidence. This is a serious problem in the thinking of the majority of educated humanity: Those who describe the conspiracies of historians and their allies are considered to be conspirators!
The books of David Ewing and Anatoly T. Fomenko are mentioned again:
