The Illusion of the Speed of Light: Understanding Rate of Induction
Throughout human history, every great scientific theory has eventually been proven wrong. Scientists often believe they have a solid understanding of the world, only to be contradicted 60, 100, or even more years later. This pattern is undeniable.
Let’s consider a quote from Nikola Tesla and examine a fundamental premise: does anything truly emit light? Right now, I have light bulbs shining in my face. We talk about light bulbs, the sun, and flashlights emitting light. But is that actually the case? When we look at a sealed vacuum tube, is anything really being emitted? No, it’s not.
Now, consider the vacuum of space. Even though space isn't a perfect vacuum, let's assume for a moment that it is. If space is nothing—if it is the absence of inertia—then what exactly is being "emitted" by the sun or a flashlight? We have this deeply ingrained idea of the "speed of light," but that’s not accurate.
It is an undeniable fact that when light passes through glass, it slows down. The average reduction in speed is around 11%. Higher capacitance light bends more due to the nature of the electromagnetic spectrum. The blue end, for example, has a higher capacitance than glass, which itself acts as a capacitor.
To illustrate capacitance, let’s look at an old electrical capacitor dated June 1947. When power surges occur—excess voltage, not current—it can exceed the capacitance of the glass, causing it to explode. This phenomenon is similar to what happened with early microwave-safe glass bowls, which could shatter due to electromagnetic radiation buildup.
Now, let’s get back to the topic of light. The mainstream belief is that light has a constant speed. But let’s challenge that idea. Consider a simple match. When you light it, does it emit light? Conventionally, we say yes. Now compare that to a nuclear explosion. A match and a nuclear explosion supposedly emit light at the exact same speed. How does that make sense?
The reality is that nothing actually emits light. Light bulbs, matches, flashlights, and even the sun do not emit light. Instead, they set up a field perturbation.
There is no "speed of light"—only a rate of induction. Light does not travel at a fixed speed; it is a coaxial circuit with transverse oscillations of electricity, magnetism, and ether perturbations. The so-called "speed of light" is simply the maximum limit of propagation for any transverse phenomenon.
Think of someone standing in the middle of a pond, flapping their arms and creating ripples. When those ripples reach the shore, would you say that person is emitting waves? No, they are perturbing the water, and the disturbance propagates outward. The same principle applies to light.
Everything in the universe is electrical, and there is only one field. Everything else is merely a modality of that field. What we call "gravity" is nothing more than dielectric acceleration—electrostatics at work.
You’ve probably seen the old trick where you rub a balloon on your hair, and it sticks, lifting your hair up. The same principle applies to what some mistakenly call “magnetic acceleration” or “electrostatic charge acceleration,” like what happens with a Van de Graaff generator. But all of these—electrostatic effects, gravity, and so on—are actually just one thing: dielectric acceleration.
The higher the capacitance, the greater the electromagnetic retardation that occurs as light passes through a capacitor, such as glass. This phase shift is why white light disperses through a prism, with shorter wavelengths bending more than longer ones. The coaxial circuit of light is mutually interdependent—cancel the dielectric compression, and you cancel the wavefront. Cancel the wavefront, and you alter or eliminate the reflection through the ether.
Take the famous double-slit experiment in quantum mechanics. The observations are correct, but the explanations are completely flawed. People assume that because an experiment is reproducible, the explanation for it must also be correct—but that’s a logical fallacy. Just because someone observes a new phenomenon doesn’t mean their interpretation is accurate.
The problem with modern physics—whether quantum mechanics, materialism, or atomism—is that it ignores field theory. Fields, by definition, have no quantity, no physicality, and are not phenomena in themselves. Maxwellian field equations describe effects over time, but they do not define what a field is. A physicist might talk about measuring flux density with a Gauss meter, but that’s just an effect over time, not a fundamental definition of a field.
Now, let’s talk about light. Einstein once said that we have two contradictory pictures of reality—wave and particle—neither of which fully explains light, yet both are needed. But this so-called “wave-particle duality” is just another way of saying ignorance. It’s like five blind men feeling an elephant: one says it’s like a wall, another says it’s like a tree trunk, another says it’s like a snake. Duality is just a lack of understanding.
Light is not a particle. There is no such thing as a photon. No one has ever found one, and no one ever will. You can’t open up a camera and spill out photons after a day of shooting. It’s ridiculous. Light is not a stream of particles; it’s a coaxial electromagnetic and dielectric circuit.
Think about a flashlight. Is it emitting light? No. It’s setting up a field perturbation by releasing charge from the battery. This works the same way in space as it does on Earth. Nothing is being emitted. There are no discrete “photons” traveling through space.
Nikola Tesla himself rejected the electromagnetic theory of light. In a quote from April 8, 1934, he stated that light is not a transverse wave in a Maxwellian ether but a longitudinal disturbance in the ether, much like a sound wave. He also pointed out a key flaw in the conventional theory: a match and the sun supposedly emit light at the exact same speed, despite vastly different energy outputs. This makes no sense unless you reject the idea that light is “emitted” and recognize that it is actually a field perturbation.
If you take two things away from this, they should be:
- Nothing emits light—it is a perturbation in a field.
- Light has no speed—it is a rate of induction.
Think about light slowing down through glass and then speeding up again once it exits. If light were just a speed, where does this extra energy come from? It’s like saying a car slows down, then magically speeds up again without applying gas. That would be nonsense. But when you understand that light is a rate of induction, it makes perfect sense.
Everything in the universe is based on capacitance, resistance, permeability, and permittivity. Light’s behavior depends on the electrical properties of the medium it moves through. The so-called “double-slit experiment” isn’t proof of photons; it’s just an example of field retardation and phase shifts in the ether.
So, to wrap this up: nothing emits light, and light is not a speed. If you understand that, you’ll be ahead of 99.99999% of people. Some may not care, but for those who seek knowledge—now you know.
The Myth of Light Emission: Challenging Conventional Science
Final Reveal:
👉 Harnessing Infinite Energy from Voltage Transients

[ Infinite Energy System ]
- You just need to assemble according to the circuit diagram.
- The generator making work will be fully guided at simple and advanced levels.
John Keely's Free Energy: Sympathetic Vibration Technology in the Ether Field